The Readiness Process enables members of a Prospero project team to prime themselves for the showing up of a high potential concept, by becoming immersed in the demands and dynamics of the project and having a felt sense of the new reality in which the desired results will arise.Please note that Readiness work is not directed towards creating readiness for change in an organisation.
What is a Prospero project?
A Prospero project is a programme of work concerned with conceiving, birthing and realising the potential of a new creation (product, service, facility such as this website, enterprise, work practice, community initiative and so on) that will generate widespread value, infuse people’s lives with meaning and joy, and enrich the world.
In an organisational setting, the programme of work might be labelled as an innovation initiative, change intervention or problem solving project, or in some other way.
Why do Readiness work?
1. It converts the brief into a well-formed design specification for the work that lies ahead.
Never take a brief at face value. Treat it as a discussion document. No matter how set in stone it may appear, the brief is always provisional — nothing more than a first stab at specifying project requirements and providing supporting information. This is equally true whether you are a member of an internal project team or you have been brought in as an external service provider.
2. The extended project team becomes immersed in the demands and dynamics of the project.
The extended project team is composed of all those whose contribution, co-operation and consent are vital to the successful completion of the project.
Contribution means active participation. Co-operation means providing occasional assistance or, at the very least, not blocking progress. Consent means giving formal or informal approval to the proposed course of action.
Without the voices of these people in the room, certain assumptions will go unchallenged, some beneficiaries’ interests and requirements will not be taken into account, vital pieces of the jigsaw will be missing, and there could be trouble ahead.
3. A shared sense of purpose arises.
Purpose is a heartfelt desire to enrich the world in a particular way and utilise value generation potential to the full.
4. Creative imagination is activated and a potent concept appears: one that has the potential to generate maximum downstream value.
“What inspired the lyrics for Palaces of Montezuma?”
Sue, Doncaster, UK.
“I’m not really sure what inspired the lyric. It’s not the sort of question I feel I have the authority to answer. These songs, you know, just present themselves.”
Nick Cave, The Red Hand files, Issue #93 | Subscribe
Truly original ideas having the potential to enrich the world come to us by means of creative imagination, and not through synthetic imagination, which produces derivative ideas and mediocrity. Brainstorming (as conceived by Alex Osborn) and its derivatives tend to produce run of the mill ideas. Some will dispute this and cite academic research, but my experience supports the assertion. In contrast, when Readiness work has been completed, the answer often presents itself without the need for sterile diverge-then-converge ideation activities.
The Creative Lifecycle begins with Readiness
Creating the new is not a mechanical process like making Rice Krispies. It’s organic and messy; a continuous stream of activities rather than the sequence of discrete stages set out below. This is the main reason Prospero uses the analogy of human procreation and development.
The Creative Lifecycle consists of seven stages:
- Realising potential
|OT1||1983||Durham, New Hampshire, USA||Convened by Harrison Owen, Frank Burns, Jim Shannon, Linda Ackerman, Linda Nelson, Lawry DiBivort, John Adams and others. See The OT Story by John Adams to find out how OT1 came into being.|
|OT2||1984||Columbia, Maryland, USA|
|OT3||1985||Monterey, California, USA||Harrison Owen originated Open Space (the Technology suffix was not added until 1989 — find out more) specifically for OT3. Open Space was used as the format for almost every OT symposium from then on. Harrison Owen was the principal convenor of every OT symposium in the US from OT3 in 1985 to OT18 in 2000.|
|OT4||1986||Tarrytown, New York, USA|
|OT5||1987||Ashridge, Berkshire. UK||Convened by John Adams, Sabina Spencer, Frank Burns, and Lisa Carlson. OT5 gave rise to the European stream of OT symposia.|
|OT6||1988||1. San Diego, California, USA|
2. Djurö, near Stockholm, Sweden
|2. Convened by Jan Backelin, Göran Wiklund and others. This was where Jack Martin Leith experienced Open Space for the first time.|
|OT7||1989||1. Madison, Wisconsin, USA|
2. Amsterdam, Netherlands
|2. Convened by Ton van der Kroon, Oscar David and others.|
|OT8||1990||1. Princeton, New Jersey, USA|
2. Gersau, Lake Lucerne, Switzerland
|OT9||1991||1. Winter Park, Colorado, USA|
2. Galosfa, Hungary
|OT10||1992||1. Armand Hammer College, Montezuma, New Mexico, USA|
2. St Petersburg, Russia
|OT11||1993||1. Coolfont Conference Center, Berkeley Springs, West Virginia, USA|
2. Yekaterinaberg, Russia
|OT12||1994||1. Napa Valley, California, USA|
2. Gaunts House, Wimborne, Dorset, UK
|2. Convened by Jack Martin Leith and others.|
|OT13||1995||1. Sturbridge, Massachusetts, USA|
2. The Practice Place, Crete, Greece
|2. Convened by Jack Martin Leith and others.|
|OT14||1996||1. Olympia, Washington, USA|
2. Wicklow Mountains, Ireland
3. El Bloque, Spain
|2. Convened by Mo Cohen, Jack Martin Leith (who didn’t participate) and others.|
|OT15||1997||1. Highlands, North Carolina, USA|
2. El Bloque, Spain
|OT16||1998||1. Twin Harbors, Minnesota, USA|
2. Auroville, India
|OT17||1999||Cannon Beach, Oregon, USA|
|OT18||2000||Stowe, Vermont, USA||Stowe was Harrison Owen's final OT symposium as convenor.|
|OT19||2001||1. Pawling, New York, USA|
2. Dawlish, Devon, UK
3. Grimstone Manor, Yelverton, Devon, UK
|2: January — a mini OT gathering convened by Mo Cohen and Jack Martin Leith.
3: 29 May - 3 Jun — convened by Julian Greatrex, Fiona Jamieson and Gary Purser.
|OT20||2002||Two Harbors, Minnesota, USA||Convenor: John Adams | This OT symposium ended with a symbolic funeral based on the Open Space principle “when it’s over, it’s over.”|
|OT21||2003||Glentruim, Scotland, UK||2-5 Sep 2003 | Jo Cummings, Ian Hall, John Adams, Rhoda Nussbaum and others decided that OT was not yet over! Jo and Ian hosted the OT21 meetings in their home, which is near the center of Scotland, and assisted in arranging bed and breakfast accommodation in the area.|
|OT22||2004||Newbold House, Findhorn, Scotland, UK||24-27 Aug | John Adams, Maggie Buxton and Ben Fuchs co-hosted and facilitated OT22, which included conversations with resident Findhorn Foundation members.|
|OT23||2005||Milwaukee||26-29 July | Theme: Welcoming Spirit | Convenors: Sheila Isakson, Susan Kerr, and John Adams, who was a co-convenor of OT gatherings from 1983 to 2005 — a total of 22 years.|
Here is The Creative Lifecycle in visual form. Remember that the seven stages are not really discrete, and that they are not always sequential — it may be necessary to go back and repeat some of them.
Read more about The Creative Lifecycle
The Readiness Process in 12 parts
The following overview of the Readiness Process is arranged in 12 parts. Some may not apply to your particular project. Some additional parts may be called for (please tell me about them). Some may need to be done in a different sequence. And some may need to be repeated because new insights have emerged.+ Expose and challenge any assumptions present in the brief
The team’s first task is to understand the creative brief. If this not been provided, the project team will need to produce it themselves.
The main elements of the creative brief
Purpose What is the intended purpose of this now-to-new project? Why is the new value generator or state of affairs required? How does this contribute to the enterprise’s overarching purpose?
Context What is providing the impetus for this project? What is the background story?
Requirements What specific results or outcomes are required? What value must be created for each beneficiary? What existing value must be preserved? What anti-value generation must be arrested?
Constraints These are the non-negotiables, the ‘musts’ and ‘must-nots’. Completion date and budget are included here.
The brief is nothing more than a sighting shot. The Readiness work converts the brief into a complete and robust design specification. Once the team has understood the contents of the brief, its next task is to expose and challenge any assumptions its authors may have made.
We believe that by adopting two different constraints — outcomes and time — organizations can become more innovative. They can then afford to be less constraining of both budget and risk — the traditional constraints — largely because the clear imposition of outcome and time-bound constraints helps deliver more valuable innovation (the objective of a budget constraint, after all) and at lower risk. As the people working in your innovation teams will tell you, that’s very good news for genuine innovation.
Source: Innovation Starts with Defining the Right Constraints. by Fiona Murray and Elsbeth Johnson, on Harvard Business Review website.
Some assumptions will be obvious; others may be hidden or disguised.
Here are a few examples:
- “This is a design thinking project.”
- “………….. is the cause.”
- “The planned change will be fiercely resisted.”
- “Agile is the way forward.”
- “Culture is the key issue.”
Common purpose ensures that everyone is working in unison, pursuing the same ends for the same reason. It is not synonymous with alignment, which lives solely in the mind. Purpose inhabits not just the mind but also the heart. In the Japanese and Chinese languages, heart and mind are the same word: kokoro and xin respectively. You can read more about kokoro here.
Specify beneficiary value: In order to create the vision of realised potential you will need to determine the value requirements of each beneficiary group as it relates to your project. A beneficiary group is a group of entities that gain value from the enterprise in a particular way, such as customers, suppliers, or investors.
The value specification process enables you to examine each member of the beneficiary set and determine:
- What existing value must be preserved.
- What new value might be created.
- What anti-value generation must be eliminated.
- What value must be sacrificed for the good of the whole. When value is sacrificed in this way, the consequent generation of anti-value must be foreseen and mitigated, and those experiencing the anti-value may need some form of compensation.
The reasoning here is that if the project meets the value requirements of all members of the beneficiary set, they will support the project, or—at the very least—will not hinder its progress.
Note that creating the value specification is a painstaking process and much more than a form-filling exercise.
Vision of realised potential: The team envisions a new reality in which the required value is being generated. The vision is outward-facing: its focus is the world, not the enterprise. It takes the form of an actual picture accompanied by a vivid and compelling synopsis. It depicts a desired present, not a desired future. And it reflects an ethos of world enrichment and unconditional service.
The more members there are in the extended project team, the harder it may be to secure common purpose. But time and effort spent here will reap rewards later.
For example, a graphic designer receives a brief to design a new logo. The client’s non-negotiables include: “Do not use orange.” Instead of taking the constraint at face value, the designer challenges it by showing the client a dozen samples of colours that might be described as orange, and asks “Which of these are ruled out?” The client sorts the samples into three batches, which she labels orange, dark yellow and light brown. The phantom constraint has been revealed and new possibilities have arisen.
A common type of phantom constraint is what Gary Hamel (see here), and Rowan Gibson in his book The Four Lenses of Innovation, call orthodoxies. These are the norms, conventions, false assumptions, cherished beliefs, unwritten rules and sacred cows that impose limits on thinking and constrain action in an enterprise, sector or industry.
Rowan Gibson discusses The Four Lenses of Innovation (runtime 4:15)
Every industry is built around long-standing, often implicit, beliefs about how to make money. In retail, for example, it’s believed that purchasing power and format determine the bottom line. In telecommunications, customer retention and average revenue per user are seen as fundamental. Success in pharmaceuticals is believed to depend on the time needed to obtain approval from the US Food and Drug Administration. Assets and regulations define returns in oil and gas. In the media industry, hits drive profitability. And so on.
These governing beliefs reflect widely shared notions about customer preferences, the role of technology, regulation, cost drivers, and the basis of competition and differentiation. They are often considered inviolable—until someone comes along to violate them. Almost always, it’s an attacker from outside the industry. But while new entrants capture the headlines, industry insiders, who often have a clear sense of what drives profitability, are well positioned to play this game, too.
How can incumbents do so? In a nutshell, the process begins with identifying an industry’s foremost belief about value creation and then articulating the notions that support this belief. By turning one of these underlying notions on its head—reframing it—incumbents can look for new forms and mechanisms to create value. When this approach works, it’s like toppling a stool by pulling one of the legs.
Source: Disrupting beliefs: A new approach to business-model innovation, by Marc de Jong and Menno van Dijk, in McKinsey Quarterly, July 2015
The team explores the external factors that might have a bearing on the project, perhaps using a framework such as STEEP (Social, Technological, Environmental, Economic, and Political factors).
Discontinuities will be of particular interest. A discontinuity is a convergence of events or trends that substantially changes the structure of an industry or the rules of the game, thereby opening up new possibilities for value generation. Greg Satell writes about this phenomenon in How Inflection Points Define The Future.
The team is now primed for the moment of conception
Now that each Prospero project team member is fully immersed in the demands and dynamics of the project and has a felt sense of the new reality in which the desired results will arise, the team is primed for the moment of conception—when imagination produces a concept with the potential to generate abundant value and enrich the world. The concept may reveal itself as a mental image, a rough sketch, a physical feeling, an inner dialogue, a few words, a metaphor, a symbol, or in some other form.